The Unforeseeable Dystopia
In the not-so-distant future….you wake up to the soft hum of morning light filtering
through your curtains only to find that your thoughts are not entirely your own. As you rub the
sleep from your eyes, a subtle murmur permeates your consciousness—a voice not from within,
but deceivingly originating from the depths of your own mind. It's not your inner monologue; it's
an advertisement, an intrusive whisper heralding the latest product with nerving precision: "Buy
the newest Neuralink Enhancement Module," your inner monologue says. You ponder, "How did
this happen? Have my dreams been hijacked by the digital realm?" This dystopian awakening is
not a figment of science fiction but a potential chilling future reality. The intrusion of ads into the
sanctity of one's thoughts serves as a disconcerting prologue to the age where technology and
consciousness intertwine, a narrative that urges us to question the price we pay for progress. In
the ever-evolving landscape of technology, social media has become an integral part of our daily
lives. However, the question arises: Should we embrace this digital frontier or sever ties with it
altogether? This essay contends that the time has come to take a definitive stance and delete our
social media accounts. The ramifications of prolonged exposure to these platforms are vast and
multifaceted, ranging from the modification of behavior to the insidious intertwining of
technology and our cognitive processes.
In this broad belt of human unconsciousness, which is immune to conscious criticism and
control, we stand defenseless, open to all kinds of influences and psychic infections. Social
media, once a tool for communication, has transformed into a behavior modifier. It not only
reflects but actively shapes our beliefs and perspectives. A study published in The Journal of
International Communication found that individuals who frequently engage with content
supporting their political views become more entrenched in those beliefs, leading to increased
polarization (Kubin). The research shows that people become more polarized and less moderate
in their views when exposed to content that ratifies their pre-existing opinions. The result is a
fractured society, with individuals inhabiting echo chambers that reinforce their biases (Lanier).
Algorithms designed to maximize engagement and keep users scrolling serve as powerful
amplifiers of this effect. As a result, people are increasingly isolated from diverse viewpoints and
are less likely to engage in constructive dialogue with those who hold different opinions.
Beyond behavior modification, social media operates on a psychological framework akin
to gambling. The allure lies in the perfect mix of good and bad experiences, much like a slot
machine. Platforms such as TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts exploit this dynamic,
creating addictive loops where users hope for a payoff of engaging content amid the sea of
mundane or even harmful material. Social media, in many ways, resembles a form of digital
gambling, where users are drawn into a cycle of engagement, not entirely different to the allure
of casinos. Much like gamblers who continue to bet despite losing streaks, social media users
often find themselves scrolling endlessly, even when they encounter content that they might find
offensive or disagreeable (Zentall). This paradoxical behavior can be attributed to the
intermittent rewards system employed by both social media platforms and gambling
establishments. Just as the house allows the gambler to occasionally win to keep them hooked,
social media offers a mix of desirable and offensive content, ensuring that users keep coming
back, hoping to strike the digital jackpot of compelling posts or interactions. This peculiar
inclination to tolerate occasional losses, or in the case of social media, unwanted content, speaks
to the powerful psychological grip these platforms have on our behavior and emotions.
The recent global pandemic has catalyzed this shift in societal norms, pushing more
interactions into the digital realm. This has given rise to an altered reality where physical and
virtual spaces intertwine. As we navigate this new normal, the desire to return to the "good old
days" becomes a nostalgic longing that most likely may never be fulfilled. Ever since the
pandemic people are spending more and more time on social media, but less and less people are
feeling those social connections in-person; 56% of people feel more isolated since the onset of
the pandemic, and 29% report feeling more depressed (Davis). Even through personal
experience, my current in-person biology class consists of 55 students and a mere 15 show up on
a consistent basis, so much so that my professor had to make attendance an assignment just to get
a few more heads to show. In contrast, on the opposite spectrum of the world stage, China has
began to instill the implementation of computer software and devices monitoring students' focus
levels through headsets which is a clear testament to the growing surveillance state facilitated by
technology; “Chinese pupils must wear 'mind-reading' headbands which scan their brains and
will alert teachers if they are not concentrating in class” (You). Apple's recent patent for a brain
wave sensor further exemplifies the oncoming encroachment of invasive technologies into our
personal lives.
The insidious control exerted by tech giants like Google and YouTube extends beyond
mere surveillance. These platforms aim not only to influence behavior but also to control and
manipulate users for financial gain. The Wall Street Journal reported on Google's algorithms
promoting sensational and divisive content to keep users engaged, thereby maximizing
advertising revenue (Horwitz). In China, the birthplace of TikTok, there exists a profound
acknowledgement of the inherently addictive nature of this slot-machine-style social media
content. Consequently, Chinese regulators have implemented measures to address this concern.
These measures include not only imposing screen time limits on the app but also curating the
content to predominantly feature educational material. This proactive approach showcases a deep
understanding of the potential harm associated with unrestricted social media usage and
underscores the commitment to safeguarding users from the adverse effects of excessive
engagement with such platforms. The Chinese example serves as a compelling illustration of the
responsibility that social media creators and regulators across the globe, including the United
States, ought to assume in mitigating the addictive qualities of these digital spaces.
Even platforms like YouTube, once considered a haven for informative and entertaining
content, are succumbing to the addictive allure of short-form videos. The shift towards YouTube
Shorts undermines the platform's original purpose, leaving users, including those who had
distanced themselves from mainstream social media, struggling with addictive content. This
change represents a notable departure from YouTube’s original standard of content, as it
increasingly caters to the demand for quick, snackable content. Consequently, users (including
myself) who initially sought refuge from mainstream social media platforms now find
themselves grappling with the captivating yet potentially addictive nature of these shorter videos.
While there are positive aspects to social media, such as connecting with friends and sharing
ideas, the pervasive negative consequences overshadow these benefits. Viewing social media as a
mere bulletin board for information rather than an authoritative source is a healthier perspective.
Instances of misinformation and manipulation on social media platforms have been widely
reported, undermining the credibility of information shared on these platforms.
The old saying holds true: If a service is free, you are the product. The monetization of
user data, facilitated by targeted advertising, transforms users into commodities sold to the
highest bidder. An investigative piece by Forbes highlighted how social media platforms profit
from user data by selling targeted advertisements, emphasizing the commodification of user
information (Leetaru). The practice of monetizing user data raises significant privacy concerns.
As users interact with various online platforms, they unknowingly leave digital footprints that are
harvested and analyzed for commercial purposes (Lanier). This not only undermines the privacy
of individuals but also poses a threat to their autonomy, as their personal information is used to
manipulate consumer behavior. Furthermore, the lack of transparency in data collection and
usage practices often leaves users in the dark about how their information is being utilized,
calling into question the ethical implications of such business models.
As technology advances, the integration of artificial intelligence and brain-machine
interfaces becomes a looming reality. Elon Musk's Neuralink, while holding promise for
enhancing human capabilities, raises concerns about the extent to which our cognition will be
tethered to AI, potentially amplifying the risks associated with unchecked technological
advancements. Musk's statement in Forbes regarding Neuralink's potential to mitigate the risks
of AI underscores the intertwined future of human consciousness and artificial intelligence
(Hart). This integration poses fundamental questions about the preservation of humanity as we
know it and privacy. As our thoughts and neurological patterns become increasingly interfaced
with AI systems, there arises the potential for unprecedented forms of surveillance and
manipulation. The ethical and societal implications of such technologies are profound, ranging
from the potential loss of individuality to the blurring of the lines between human and machine
intelligence/programing. Moreover, the reliance on AI-enhanced brain interfaces could lead to
new forms of dependency, where individuals are no longer able to function or make decisions
without the aid of technology. These concerns highlight the need for robust ethical frameworks
and regulatory oversight to ensure that such advancements benefit humanity without
compromising fundamental human values and rights.
In conclusion, the convergence of technology, surveillance, and behavioral modification
paints a dystopian picture. The current trajectory, marked by addiction, manipulation, and
corporate control, leaves me little room for optimism. The merging of Neuralink or Apple’s brain
censors and AI paints a future where those who resist the integration of technology risk being left
behind economically and socially. These technologies resemble the biblical metaphor of Adam
and Eve's apple from the Tree of Knowledge, bestowing a newfound consciousness and
unveiling a realm previously unexplored, except this realm is full of total egalitarian control by
your favorite social media companies. The iceberg of today's technology is merely the tip, and as
we hurtle toward an uncertain future, the choice to delete our social media accounts emerges as a
radical act of reclaiming your mind in an increasingly controlled world. It's a decision to resist
the addictive allure, the surveillance state, and the corporate manipulation that defines our digital
existence. The hope for a better future lies not in blind optimism but in the collective awakening
to the perils of unchecked technological progress. The time to act is now, before we find
ourselves irreversibly ensnared in the web of our own creation…
Works Cited
Davis, Sarah. “Form Relationships since COVID-19, Survey Reveals .” Forbes, 28 Sept. 2023,
www.forbes.com/health/mind/social-anxiety-since-covid-survey/. Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
Hart, Robert. “Elon Musk Says Neuralink Could Slash Risk from AI as Firm Prepares for First
Human Trials.” Forbes, 26 Sept. 2023,
www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2023/09/21/elon-musk-says-neuralink-could-slash-risk-f
rom-ai-as-firm-prepares-for-first-human-trials/?sh=46c30c782956. Accessed 9 Nov.
2023.
Horwitz, Jeff. “The Facebook Files, Part 4: The Outrage Algorithm - the Journal. - WSJ
Podcasts.” WSJ, 18 Sept. 2021,
www.wsj.com/podcasts/the-journal/the-facebook-files-part-4-the-outrage-algorithm/e619
fbb7-43b0-485b-877f-18a98ffa773f. Accessed 8 Nov. 2023.
Kubin, Emily. “The Role of (Social) Media in Political Polarization: A Systematic Review.”
Annals of the International Communication Association, 2021,
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070,
https://doi.org/10.1080//23808985.2021.1976070. Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
Lanier, Jaron. Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now. Random
House Uk, 29 May 2018.
Leetaru, Kalev. “What Does It Mean for Social Media Platforms to “Sell” Our Data?” Forbes, 12
Oct. 2022,
www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2018/12/15/what-does-it-mean-for-social-media-platf
orms-to-sell-our-data/?sh=bee4b32d6c4d. Accessed 9 Nov. 2023.
Zhuk 8
You, Tracy. “Chinese School Makes Pupils Wear Brain-Scanning Headbands in Class to Ensure
They Pay Attention.” Mail Online, Daily Mail, 31 Oct. 2019,
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7634705/Chinese-school-makes-pupils-wear-brain-sca
nning-headbands-class-ensure-pay-attention.html. Accessed 8 Nov. 2023.
Zentall, Thomas R. “An Animal Model of Human Gambling Behavior.” Current Research in
Behavioral Sciences, vol. 4, 1 Jan. 2023, pp. 100101–100101,
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518223000062,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100101. Accessed 7 Nov. 2023.
